How UC San Diego Manages Limited Submissions
University of California, San Diego shares how they use InfoReady to share limited submission and extramural grant opportunities across campus.
Read, Watch and Learn How InfoReady Makes Work Easier
Articles, client stories, case studies, webinars and much more fill the InfoReady blog. Contact us if you have any questions or are ready to see a demo.
It's project season! The end of the academic year often signals a change in the type of work occurring in higher education. Summer can bring a reprieve from hectic daily activity and ushers in longer blocks of uninterrupted time for projects that were too time-intensive for the prime months of the academic calendar. It also provides space for thinking and planning.
As you might guess, we have a few suggestions for projects that can take your use of InfoReady to the next level and make the platform more effective at your institution.
University of California, San Diego shares how they use InfoReady to share limited submission and extramural grant opportunities across campus.
Progress Reports in InfoReady empowers administrators to easily collect information from all awardees in standardized forms they design and customize.
Learn how to manage the expectations of your reviewers to ensure a smooth review process and positive experience.
PUIs don’t have a huge budget to support the research infrastructure. InfoReady is one tool they can use in many different ways.
Penn State University currently has several units using InfoReady for their unique needs.
InfoReady allows higher ed administrators to customize email templates within the system to send personalized messages.
University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center (MCC) shared best practices for managing the post-award process using progress reports in InfoReady.
The integration between Pivot-RP by ProQuest and InfoReady drastically shortens the time from finding a funding opportunity to collecting...
Administrators have a built-in opportunity for helping faculty reach their service quota: encouraging them to become reviewers.
Panelists from Drexel University and Indiana University share best practices for structuring and facilitating internal funding competitions.