Tips for Multitrack Competitions from George Washington University

  • July 28, 2021
Do you need to manage one competition that has application forms or review processes that vary based on a certain designation or criteria? In a recent webinar, Shari Thompson, Research Enhancement Analyst at George Washington University, shared her experience with one of InfoReady’s newest features: Multitrack competitions.

Multitrack competitions have all the components of a regular competition, with the added ability of being able to send applications down a certain "track", based on an initial gating question. Administrators can then manage all applications in one central area. Below are Shari’s tips for making the most of this functionality.

Don’t Be Daunted 

The main set up is the same as any competition, just repeated for each track an administrator chooses to create.

As Shari points out: “It looks a little daunting, but I guarantee it is not!”

Use Navigation Status Table

After creating the initial tracks, all are displayed in an easy-to-read table: “You are free to move around the table as you desire to configure.”

Even after launching, the table allows administrators to quickly go back and make edits to any portion.

Copy Your Tracks

Once the first track is configured, navigating to subsequent tracks always prompts the administrator to either copy the configuration of a previous track, or create a new one.

As Shari notes: “Now that’s where it really, really does save a lot of time.” For example, if the application form is almost identical across tracks except for one file upload, copy the Requirements from track to track and then simply edit the one differentiating upload option.

Get Creative

While Shari has primarily used multitrack competitions for intramural funding, she recommended several other potential use cases:

  • Collect polling info: 1 submission per applicant equals 1 vote
  • Build reviewer pool: Scholarly vs. research reviewers, early vs. experienced
  • Collaborator requests: Serve as collaborator vs. wanting to collaborate
  • Monitor conflict of interest: Faculty vs. staff
  • Form collection for approval

We want to thank Shari for sharing her experience using multitrack competitions to streamline application and review processes.

View the webinar recording

More Blog Posts

Related Articles

Keep reading. There's more to discover about InfoReady.

How to Double Limited Submissions: Tips from an AVP

November 30, 2018
The following is a list of tips from Kim Littlefield, Asst. VP for Research and Development and Learning, University of...

How FHSU Significantly Improved their Poster Competitions

August 31, 2018
“Our annual poster competition used to be a logistical nightmare, requiring the time and resources of numerous...

Acknowledgement Statements for Applicants and Reviewers

July 28, 2020
Do you need applicants or reviewers to verify they have no conflicts of interest or to agree to other policies and...

Ready to see InfoReady for yourself?

Let us show you how InfoReady can ease your workload and automate most of your review and approval processes.